Friday, September 10, 2010

Green Up Moggill

Greens campaign for the Moggill state election in 2009

Archive for the ‘travel’ Category

Posted by philip On July 27, 2009

I sent the following on 23 June 2009 either by email or by via their web site to each of Campbell Newman, the State Minister of Transport Rachel Nolan and the state member in whose area the incident occurred, Scott Emerson:

On my way into the University of Queensland today on my bicycle, the
driver of the 428 bus that arrived on campus at about 8:40 behaved in
a consistently intimidatory way, including driving right up behind me
to stop at bus stops on the way, and overtaking me on the last stretch
of Hawken Drive before UQ so close I could have reached out to touch
the bus (this last event when the road was wide, and there was no
oncoming traffic, so there was absolutely no excuse). A bus is a
dangerous weapon when used in this fashion. Sooner or later this kind
of behaviour is going to result in serious injury or a fatality.

I have complained several times about the way bus drivers attempt to
push bikes off the roads to no effect.

This time if I get no satisfactory response be assured that I will
launch a public campaign.

I received a reply from Campbell Newman, dated 16 July, addressing my concerns in detail. The bus driver concerned has been placed on a performance improvement plan, and this information has been used to improve driver training.

I am yet to hear from the other politicians. While Campbell Newman is the person most able to take action, it is disappointing that the others did not take the matter seriously enough at least to reply.

While I disagree with Campbell Newman on many policy issues, I would like to thank him for taking this issue seriously and taking remedial action.

Nonetheless the city’s overall approach to bicycle safety is inadequate: incidents like this are not purely a matter of driver training but also a consequence of mixing too many incomptible vehicles on the same roadway. While there are some excellent bikeways, once you are off them you have little option but to mix with either heavy traffic or pedestrians. It’s as if the city, wanting to learn from its lesson of neglecting motorway construction in the era when that was considered a good idea, is trying to remedy this oversight by focusing solely on the equivalent of motorways for bicycles. It’s all very well to have a clear run between far out of the city and the city centre, but having to mix with other traffic in city and suburban streets remains a serious problem.

If everyone who had the option to use a bike felt safe to do so, traffic would be signficantly reduced, reducing the need for more roads. We would have a healthier population, and local businesses would do better because the average person would shop locally more often, rather than waiting until a long enough shopping list had accumulated to justify taking the car to the mall.

Let’s keep working on th big picture: a city that’s fun and safe to live in, with healthy lifestyle options accessible to all, not just the adventurous few willing to take their lives in their hands every time they venture onto the streets.

Posted by philip On March 18, 2009

It is quite bizarre that you can get a TransLink ticket from Nambour to the city, but not from Karana Downs.

Just in case it’s not obvious how bizarre this is, here is a map showing how far Nambour out is:

View Larger Map

And here’s a map to the same scale showing how far out Karana Downs is:

View Larger Map

The city and state governments have seriously dropped the ball on this one.

The Greens plan for Karana Downs is to extend the city Buz network to the area, with connection to the existing 444 service that currently goes out towards Moggill. In the longer term, once light rail is in place, we will provide a feeder service to light rail.

Karana Downs may be a relatively recent addition to Brisbane, but the public transport network is ultimately a state responsibililty and includes many cities and towns that are not part of Brisbane. How hard can it be to get this right?

Another critical area of need in Karana Downs is a High School, which has long been talked about, but nothing has happened. A high school will relieve considerable pressure on the roads as well as building the local community.

Posted by philip On March 15, 2009

Gap Creek Road is a bit of an oddity: a gravel road not far from the centre of a major city.


View Larger Map

The area through which the road passes includes undeveloped land, and has significant wildlife, including endangered species. It goes through Brisbane Forest Park, a significant refuge of biodiversity close to an urban area. Such wild spaces are part of our Queensland heritage, and should not be trashed in the name of convenience. That Brisbane Forest Park is close to the city is an asset, not a liability. A city needs green space to renew its air supply and to provide its residents with the quality of life that concrete and glass cannot supply.

Having any road through that area will have an environmental impact; the question is how best to manage that impact. There are significant problems arising from having an unsealed road, including damage to cars, dust and run-off from the road. There is also the potential for erosion. On the other hand if the road is not only sealed but widened and made suitable for relatively high speed travel, the environmental impact on wildlife will be significantly increased. Worse, if traffic on the road doubles, the Forest Park will cease to have the character of a wild place.

Here’s a comment I received from a knowledgeable resident, who is an ecologist:

  • Koalas have been seen on properties in Gap Creek Rd and in Mt. Coot-tha Forest in 2008 and crossing Gap Creek Road: Listed as Vulnerable under the State Nature Conservation Act.
  • Swift Parrots sighted in the area: collisions with cars listed as a threatening process to this bird which is listed as Endangered under the Federal EPBC Act. Most recent sighting for this species was Kersley d, Kenmore in 2007, with annual sightings recorded since 2002 in the Chapel Hill, Kenmore, Mt. Coot-tha areas.
  • Wildlife roadkills on Gap Creek Rd, just for 2008: four wallabies, four bandicoots, two reptiles, two possums, three tawny frogmouths, one owl, one brush turkey.
  • Remember these figures are incredibly conservative because they are only those that are actually reported to me and verified. Many victims are unreported or flee into the bush to die.

While there may be a case for sealing the road, turning it into a relatively high-speed thoroughfare is contrary to the nature of a Forest Park road. The mentality behind this proposal is part of the general mindset in Brisbane of designing infrastructure for increased car use. That trend includes billions of dollars spent on tunnels and bridges, and the proposed Kenmore Bypass.

The Greens position is that car use will remain an important part of our lives but every reasonable step should be taken to provide reasonable alternatives. Planning therefore to double traffic through Gap Creek Road is yet another step in the wrong direction. As with the Kenmore Bypass, we see long-term neglect of planning followed up by quick-fix solutions based on an outdated mindset.

The Greens proposal for Gap Creek Road is to seal it but to design it as a forest road aimed at relatively low-speed travel, with careful consideration of measures to minimize impacts on wildlife. Any change to the design of the road – including sealing – should be justified by a credible, independent expert environmental impact assessment that takes into account that the road cuts through the proposed D’Aguilar Biosphere Reserve buffer zone and a designated Conservation Area.

Do you have an opinion? Let me know.

Posted by philip On March 13, 2009

Brisbane Light Rail Proposal

light rail routes (click for bigger version)

Queensland Greens propose a city-wide light rail system to supplement the existing public transport network. Light rail has several benefits. It is quicker and cheaper to put in than heavy rail. Routes along which it runs become a focus for development, especially shops and businesses. By contrast, bus routes can easily change, reducing the certainty needed for planning for future business. Although parts of the system may run like a tram through city streets, we envisage that most of the network will be separated from roads. Some sections may run above the existing rail network in areas of high density.

In Moggill, we propose to take the light rail system through Kenmore South to Pullenvale and Moggill, with a possible extension across the river to meet the Ipswich line, depending on local consultation about a river crossing.

The alignment of the route is initially proposed to follow the Kenmore Bypass corridor, since this area was originally designated as a light rail corridor.

The actual route will be investigated taking into account environmental impacts and noise.

Before we would start drawing lines on a map, we would have an extensive community consultation to determine the ideal routing of the line, including options other than the Kenmore Bypass corridor.

This plan is part of the Greens commitment to helping you get around, without being stuck in heavy traffic. It is also part of the Greens commitment to real green jobs. It is also part of involving you in planning your own community, so let me know if you have comments or ideas of your own.

Please also remember the survey where light rail is one of the options on which to express your opinion.

Posted by philip On March 3, 2009

The following survey arises out of many opinions I’ve heard while talking to people. There’s a limit to how many people I can talk to, so please let me know by taking the survey what you think.

You can also email me if you want to talk further.

The survey is anonymous with some checks to prevent duplicate submissions.

As always, I value community opinion.

Thanks for all the responses. Watch this space for follow-ups

Posted by philip On February 9, 2009

Many more bicycles are sold than cars in Australia, a trend that has persisted over the last nine years. You wouldn’t think it from how little infrastructure is provided for bikes. Given the combined problems of climate change, peak oil and the obesity epidemic, getting more people out of their cars and onto bikes has to be a priority. Why it isn’t for the other parties is not for me to say; it definitely is for the Greens.

I plan on campaigning for a number of improvements in bike infrastructure, including continuing with current plans to improve the bikeway infrastructure. However, bikeways are not enough. It should be safe to ride a bike in suburban and city streets as well.

Here are some details. Watch this space as I pick up more ideas from the community.

  • safe bike paths in suburban and city streets
    • bikeways are only part of the solution; local streets as well as the long-haul routes need to be safe
    • paint on a road is no protection from a vehicle weight 40 times your weight
  • cycle and pedestrian awareness built into road design
    • for example if the footpath and cycle path are raised relative to the road surface, drivers crossing these paths have to be aware that they are no longer in a car-only space
  • environmentally sensitive mountain biking
    • end the conflict between mountain bikers and conservationists in our green spaces
  • include bikes in detour planning
    • when road construction or capital works impede traffic flow alternatives for cars are always added
    • bike paths sometimes simply disappear
Posted by philip On February 5, 2009

Watch this space for brief reviews of science topics and pointers to places where you can find out more.

If the World is Warming, How can we have very cold weather?
Global warming refers to the long-term world-wide average. Redistribution of energy from one part of the planet to another may make some areas warmer and others cooler. For example, in the northern hemisphere 2009-2010 winter, some areas experienced extreme cold. However, if you look at the distribution of northern hemisphere temperatures, what happened was that the Arctic warmed considerably. Look at the image: the Arctic region shows strong warming, with Greenland considerably warmer than usual (more accurately, less chilly), yet Northern Europe and North America are large local areas of cooling. Possibly this effect caused cold air to move south, but in any case, the cooler overall northern hemisphere in the most inhabited regions has hit the news, a slightly misleading picture when you look at the whole map.

Dead Zones
A dead zone is part of the ocean where oxygen levels are too low (less than 2 parts per million) to support life, or anoxic. Here is a site at Montana State University that provides some information. For more, see NASA’s information on dead zones. Algal blooms can make part of an ocean anoxic. In an extreme case, about 251-million years ago, the oceans became widely anoxic, as part of a mass extinction event at the boundary between the Permian and Triassic though probably that event had different causes.

Life In Your Back Yard
Want to find out if there are endangered species or unwanted alien invaders somewhere, or just check out who or what your wild neighbours are? The federal environment department has a great tool for finding these things out. Click the “Interactive Map link, find your area of interest on the map, click Report and use the mouse to drag out a rectangle on the map.

Tesla EV sedan

How Green is the electric car?
Electric cars – in the early days of motoring, a mainstream option – are making a comeback, with variations such as hybrids and plug-in hybrids. But how green are they really? Here’s an article with more detail. Check out Tesla’s first sedan. A UK company, Riversimple, has some interesting ideas on how to build an ultra-efficient car using a hydrogen fuel cell. I remain unconvinced of the hydrogen economy because hydrogen takes a lot of energy to produce, but Riversimple has some interesting ideas, like leasing the cars rather than selling them as a way of avoiding the false economy of planned obsolescence.

Smart Grid
Something that will be talked about increasingly is managing energy use more intelligently not only to be more efficient but to fit swings in demand to swings in supply better, as a remedy for the intermittency of some modes of renewable energy. Look out for articles about the smart grid such as this one.

Electric Vehicles
Now that the Obama administration is talking up clean energy, there’s been an explosion of interest in electric vehicles, so much so that rather than summarize articles, I’ll list pointers to them here as I encounter them:

Biochar
Biochar is the idea of burning carbon-containing materials in low oxygen (pyrolysis), resulting in charcoal that can be buried in the ground, improving the soil while sequestering carbon and reducing nitrous oxide (potent greenhouse gas) emissions from the soil. Biochar can also be used to produce biofuels as a byproduct. Here’s a nice YouTube summary of Australian work on biochar:

“Clean” coal
Various projects claim to be cleaning up coal. Carbon sequestration is one of the buzz words. The theory is that you can bury the CO2 deep underground. In practice, to do so on a significant scale would be very hard. The perceived need for carbon sequestration arises from the incorrect perception that a coal producing country like Australia cannot survive a transition away from coal, a claim that is hotly contested even by former coal supporters. Here are some contrary views:

Some obstacles: worldwide emissions would amount to around 30km3 per year even compressed down to a liquid. One power station would be a lot less but still a vast volume of toxic gas to handle. Pumping it out at high temperature through a high smoke stack dissipates it into the air, and turbulence mixes it into the atmosphere quickly. A cold leak at ground level on the other hand will not dissipate fast, and can kill people in large numbers, as occasionally happens as a result of volcanic processes. Here is a detailed critique I wrote of a “clean coal” proposal for Felton in Queensland. And here is a Coen brothers ad featuring their take on clean coal:

Forest management and climate change
The forestry lobby is big on the benefits of harvesting timber. Cutting down trees, they claim, is somehow good because new growth will sequester even more carbon. The reality is a lot more complex than that; logging old growth is almost always a net loss, and managing plantations for the best overall return on carbon emissions takes careful management. This Forest, Carbon, Climate Myths slide show covers most of the major issues.

Regenerating lost forests
Watch biologist Willie Smits explain how he re-grew clearcut rainforest in Borneo, saving local orangutans – and at the same time creating work for the locals. Ignore the car ads.

Read the rest of this entry »